Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-26997314-20170904000946/@comment-30285046-20170906194710

Saxonerd wrote: 1. He is not being greedy. He is just saying he thinks it would be cool to add. 2. It is bullying, you are calling him annoying, making fun of him, and saying his thoughts are stupid. 3. I agree with him. I agree that DL should add things to make the game more balanced! 4. He is human, he has feelings. If you were being roasted, you would get angry(don't say you wouldn't!) 5. It is not his fault that you choose to not ignore. 6. I'll give you a cold slap of reality. Chances are you'll do nothing, you'll be nothing, when you die no one will remember you except for your family and few friends. There are 7.5 billion people on earth, most of them are just unnecessary pieces in a big unnecessary machine. 7. I'm not your friend. I don't have many and I don't need many. I work better alone. 1. do you even read. he's being greedy because he wants paid weapons for free. thats greed, aka a intense desire for power(in the form of OP weapons) in the game. thats the DEFINITION OF GREED. so please. do some research, google it, do something before you come here acting like you know what the hell youre talking about.

2. bullying-using superior strength to coerce people into doing something. I haven't used any strength or influence to make him do anything. therefore i am not BULLYING anyone. im not forcing anyone to do anything, im just explaining my point of view on this. and no i dont call him "stupid" for his ideas, not once on this thread. but i call him an idiot for not listening, not explaining his arguements, and not explicating why such ideas would be good for the game. Again, read what i write, then respond.

3. you agree that adding OP weapons for free would balance the game?? are you serious. that would make the game UNPLAYABLE. imagine a lobby where everyone is getting oneshotted instantly, it would be literally unplayable, where you would spend more time respawning than running! adding stuff like "nuclear bombs" would just instakill everyone including yourself,you think thats a good idea?? thats literally the definition of umplayable. adding a "ghostbuster trap shooter" you think thats balanced?? if you do please please rethink it.

4. i never said i wouldn't get angry whats the point in pointing that out... id probably just roast them back.

5. of course its not his fault. i dont care whos fault it is, im gonna do it because. i. can. end of story. you cant tell me not to, and you cant tell me to do it. its my choice.

6. sorry but your cold slap of reality only works for the bottom 50%, 70% or even 85% of people. if you believe that you must be in that bottom portion. luckily for me, im already going somewhere. wont tell you what i do cus privacy and it doesnt matter because you probably wouldn'd believe me anyways. beecase youre stuck in that mindset that people are unneccessary, and that ill "be nothing". dont insult me by telling me im not "going anywhere" because i already am. of course i dont need to be "remembered" by anyone. just people i love and care about. i dont give a damn if some sweatshop worker from china knows me. i dont need validation from 7.5 billion people "knowing" me. your strawman arguement is overused and redundant.

let me give you a REAL arguement. top successful people in the world according to biographyonline.net. 1. bill gates. 2. steve jobs. alot of people know those two names, but do all 7.5 billion people know? i doubt it. you go anywhere in the world with no internet, no connection to the outside world (people like that exist) they wouldn't know. similarily i dont need to be recognized by all 7.5 billion people to be successful. lets kee[p going shall we. 3rd most successful person who is alive. Richard branson. worth $5B. you think anyone knows him? I didnt even know him. i dont need recognization to be successful.i dont even need $1B to be successful. if thats what you think then think again. but then again, what does this even have to do with anything at hand? going off topic to cover up your idiocy? because what i do in life, in my future, really has no bearing on what we're talking about. regardless, your point is moot either way

7. i consider everyone here on the wiki a friend. even anons. do i roast my friends? sure. though id rather say i show them what i think. if you don't want to be my "friend". I honestly dont give a damn becasue its not. my. loss.

ciao