Board Thread:Respawnables Discussion/@comment-28567397-20170408142959/@comment-30285046-20170427203231

99.7.83.4 wrote: oh so you did make it up huh. well my case is closed then. u made it up its not something thats pertinent to this game. sure theres a difference, ill give you that. but we dont need to create some sh*tty a*s name like "kill-and-shoot" lmao. I also happen to not be using logic. im usin facts. theres no such thing as "kill-and-shoot" FACT. "kill-and-collect" exists FACT. since "kill-and-shoot" doesn't exist (except in your own head) these events classify as "kill-and -collect" FACT. it doesn't actually matter what you think about it because look. "kill-and-shoot" doesnt exist. and kill-and-collect does. END OF STORY. YOURE WRONG. ACCEPT IT. MOVE ON. your figment of imagination plainly is just a useless denomination so don't even bring it up. Personally I decided (because your "kill-and-shoot" doesn't EXIST) that i would classify CNY/Ghostbusters as kill-and-collect. its not challenging type and it sure as hell isnt ranking. If you don't like it then COOL. I honestly dont give a damn. But once you step into here, criticizing even as an Anon well lets just say you aren't doing anything for yourself.

And im here like what huh? you gonna quote me and then not even explain how my argument is flawed? is it even flawed? obviously someone here doesn't even understand argumentative writing. saying "yeah way to stand up for yourself using logic" is not enough for you or anyone to justify that any part of my arguement is flawed. kill-and-shoot is just not descriptive enough. kill-and-shoot might as well define the entire game, whereas kill-and-collect happens to define events quite well. you kill ppl, you collect shamrocks,eggs,and points. Easy as that. theres no need for your infantile naming system that also happens to be weak in that it is too vague and also redundant.

unfortunatley unless you can provide a LEGITIMATE REASON why my analogy is "horrible", then it isn't horrible. Personally i think its great. and for the record i can read. quite easily. and probably better than you can. but i wont insult your reading skills (like you did) cus that isnt pertinent to the arguement, its fallacious both logically and morally, as well as a childish tactic.

again, all you have to do is check this link http://respawnables.wikia.com/wiki/Events and since there is no "kill-and-shoot" well then youre wrong. The term itself is made-up. My point, though, is not. Seriously, LEARN HOW TO FREAKING READ. I think you need a refresher, because you're basically throwing a virtual tantrum at this point, rambling on and on saying the same thing over and over. Now, you said the events were repetitive. I said how so. You went and typed a tirade. I pointed out the mistakes in your logic, and eventually it turned into an argument on what defines a "kill-and-collect" event. My thoughts are events like st. patrick's day, easter egg hunts, spooky nights, etc. You would probably say the same thing, but you're putting events where you have to shoot a boss of some sort to move on in the same category. All I'm saying is that's now how it is. Btw, I didn't even bother reading what you said because it would've done me no good lol. Only read like the first 3 sentences of your tirade again youre overexaggerating. this isnt even close to what i would call a tirade. events are repetitve becasue theyre all the same. you collect shamrocks, eggs, points whatever there all the same. obviously i know how to read, your own admission that you didnt read my post is basically aa contradicion of how you want me to learn how to read. you think i cant read? how about you actually read the post then? i make substantial arguements that are supportable by facts. you on the other hand throw around opinions, half-truths, and made up terms. who sounds more logical in this case? if you want to know why events are repetitive in my opinon all you had to do was Read. The. Post. then you'll see what im talking about. Obviously you didnt. and rather you decided to tell me how to read. Pointing out mistakes in my "logic" isnt enough. can you even justify that they are mistakes? my logic seems pretty sound. much more so that say, making up something that doesnt exist. c'mon lets be civil. i can read theres no need to tell me i need to learn how.

you shoot a boss so what? the end result is the same. you collect something. hence kill and collect. no made up bs no fake terms that dont exist.