Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25714826-20171205161411/@comment-25870855-20171206214310

TheRealLGH wrote: III rspn wrote: TheRealLGH wrote: Naturespirit321 wrote:

TheRealLGH wrote:

Naturespirit321 wrote: Bane, protecting freedom of speech has nothing to do with what happened lately. Freedom of speech does not protect fighting words. Who used fighting words? I’m not going to point fingers or bring up names otherwise it’d bring up the issue again. I’m merely pointing out that there’s no need to worry about freedom of speech because if things escalate to how they’re described in this thread, it was due to fighting words. I never used fighting words and I was the creator of the thread, so I have no idea what you're talking about, if things escalate then it has nothing to do with me, as I have stated, I'm not replying to the thread, but if someone takes advantage of that fact and tries to insult me or make unnecessary remarks, I will, however, message them and the issue becomes only revolved around me and that individual. but then again didnt naturespirit say hes not pointing fingers? so why are you assuming its you? His remark that he isnt pointing fingers makes your remark unnecessary, so why bring up the past. I am giving a condition, I'm just saying that if thisis targeted towards me (who else would it be targeted towards) then this an invalid statement. Condition--talk about demanding. Watta bully