Thread:Tr143/@comment-29825738-20161207085945/@comment-25163519-20161207222410

Naturespirit321 wrote: Darkangel12S wrote: Naturespirit321 wrote: 1. Wikipedia is not a credible source.

2. Matter is matter, not energy. Wikipedia is a reliable source.Teachers say otherise because wikipedeia has all the answers.

We will have to wait until we actually sees it, if DLE wants to classify it as an energy weapon or not Please educate yourself on what credibility is. http://guides.library.cornell.edu/criticallyanalyzing We are a wikia. Do we have credibility here?