Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25714826-20170404090254/@comment-25714826-20170408114940

Back when I had a chat with a staff member they told me that they rate all wikis by two categories: How is the wiki being managed i.e. if the admins and founder take good care of the wiki, if they are nice and welcoming, if they don't abuse they're power or make bad decisions and so on. They also rate it by the amount of banned people on that wiki. If the way the wiki is managed is bad and there are lots of banned people (anon included) then it means that our wiki has major flaws and that the leading members must be replaced by new and more responsible staff. This happened a few times here. Firstly when i was rampaging and destroying everything and banning everyone for pure banter (I lost my original founder status as punishment and got replaced by Dan), it happened again when TRABAJO made this wiki a real mess where no one could trust anyone and he turned us against each other. And it happened for the last time back when he had the Blitz crisis which actually got 2 staff members to get involved and threatened to shut down the wiki if this did not stop. We managed to get out without too much trouble but because of all of this we are pretty low on the wiki scale so that's why I come up with ideas like these so we can come back up a bit.

If you have any SERIOUS ideas to make the wiki better please let me know.