Board Thread:Respawnables Discussion/@comment-28567397-20170408142959/@comment-30285046-20170427172909

99.7.83.4 wrote: 99.7.83.4 wrote: Jesus christ man, I gave you examples of what I mean by "kill-and-shoot." Yeah, I kind of made that term up on the spot, but again, I gave you examples. Learn to read man. And holy s**t you are stubborn af. Do you not see the contrast between the "kill-and-shoot" events and the "kill-and-collect" events I gave you as examples? Literally all I'm doing is pointing out differences, and you're here like " ou "kill" someone and then what? you "shoot" a nian/ghost or whatever? then what. you just shoot them for fun? like "o i hate nians so imma shoot them" does anything happen?" Yeah, way to stand up for yourself using logic. Also, you could've just said you were going to deal with having 3 or 4 week events; you didn't have to come up with a horrible analogy. oh so you did make it up huh. well my case is closed then. u made it up its not something thats pertinent to this game. sure theres a difference, ill give you that. but we dont need to create some sh*tty a*s name like "kill-and-shoot" lmao. I also happen to not be using logic. im usin facts. theres no such thing as "kill-and-shoot" FACT. "kill-and-collect" exists FACT. since "kill-and-shoot" doesn't exist (except in your own head) these events classify as "kill-and -collect" FACT. it doesn't actually matter what you think about it because look. "kill-and-shoot" doesnt exist. and kill-and-collect does. END OF STORY. YOURE WRONG. ACCEPT IT. MOVE ON. your figment of imagination plainly is just a useless denomination so don't even bring it up. Personally I decided (because your "kill-and-shoot" doesn't EXIST) that i would classify CNY/Ghostbusters as kill-and-collect. its not challenging type and it sure as hell isnt ranking. If you don't like it then COOL. I honestly dont give a damn. But once you step into here, criticizing even as an Anon well lets just say you aren't doing anything for yourself.

And im here like what huh? you gonna quote me and then not even explain how my argument is flawed? is it even flawed? obviously someone here doesn't even understand argumentative writing. saying "yeah way to stand up for yourself using logic" is not enough for you or anyone to justify that any part of my arguement is flawed. kill-and-shoot is just not descriptive enough. kill-and-shoot might as well define the entire game, whereas kill-and-collect happens to define events quite well. you kill ppl, you collect shamrocks,eggs,and points. Easy as that. theres no need for your infantile naming system that also happens to be weak in that it is too vague and also redundant.

unfortunatley unless you can provide a LEGITIMATE REASON why my analogy is "horrible", then it isn't horrible. Personally i think its great. and for the record i can read. quite easily. and probably better than you can. but i wont insult your reading skills (like you did) cus that isnt pertinent to the arguement, its fallacious both logically and morally, as well as a childish tactic.

again, all you have to do is check this link http://respawnables.wikia.com/wiki/Events and since there is no "kill-and-shoot" well then youre wrong.