Thread:ChickenNoodleSoup123/@comment-28112369-20170603231422/@comment-28112369-20170604074600

Angangang wrote: 1. He did good before this since 2016, he didn't do anything bad except this time.

2. Everyone does mistake, learn to forgive (for the first few times, at least)

3. We don't want to many people to be banned. Banning is not fun at all.

4. Of course, banning is required for those "criminals", but he did only one mistake.

Try to understand why I want you to give warnings instead of bans... 1. I agree that he was a clean user in 2016, no problem at all

2. If you wrote an unnecessary sentence in a category, how would that be considered an accident? You don't accidentally write sentences, they are always done purposely.

3. Banning is not fun, that is correct but a warning won't solve much. Even if you told them: Don't do it again, they'll most likely do it again as they're objective is to cause trouble, at all costs

4. A little can mean a lot, did you know that? Vandalism wastes time for us admins, bureaucrats, moderators and rollbacks. Why? We have to spend precious minutes undoing their trouble